Wolf Source : online since 1995

Where the buffalo roam — and dieComments

Posted by LGK in news (Tuesday April 29, 2008 at 0913)

Where the buffalo roam — and die

GARDINER, Montana (CNN) — More than half of Yellowstone National Park’s bison herd has died since last fall, forcing the government to suspend its annual slaughter program.

Between harsh weather, hunting and an annual cull, fully half of Yellowstone National Park’s bison have died.

More than 700 of the iconic animals starved or otherwise died on the mountainsides during an unusually harsh winter, and more than 1,600 were shot by hunters or sent to slaughterhouses in a disease-control effort, according to National Park Service figures.

As a result, the park estimates its bison herd has dropped from 4,700 in November to about 2,300 today, prompting the government to halt the culling program early.

“There has never been a slaughter like this of the bison since the 1800s in this country, and it’s disgusting,” said Mike Mease of the Buffalo Field Campaign, a group seeking to stop the slaughter program for good.

Government officials say the slaughter prevents the spread of the disease brucellosis from the Yellowstone bison to cattle on land near the park. Brucellosis can cause miscarriages, infertility and reduced milk production in domestic cattle. Video Watch Yellowstone bison search for pasture »

The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that half of Yellowstone’s bison herd is infected with the bacterium.

Previously, under the Interagency Bison Management Plan, wandering bison were sent to slaughter without being tested for brucellosis. (The meat — which experts say is safe to eat if cooked — and hides were distributed to Native American groups.)

Late this winter the slaughter was limited to animals that tested positive for the disease.

Now the program has been further curtailed; no bison have been killed in the past week.

“The plan requires all of us to do two things: protect a viable wild bison population and reduce the risk of transmission of brucellosis from bison to cattle. We’re required to keep bison and cattle separate,” National Park Service spokesman Al Nash said.

The USDA acknowledges that bison-to-cattle transmission is difficult to document, but it says investigations indicate that bison were the likely source of infections in cattle herds in Wyoming and North Dakota.

But critics call the culling an overreaction. There is no documented case of the disease passing from bison to cattle, they said.

“I mean, it’s hype, it’s a hysteria,” Mease said. “And it’s not a fatal disease.”

Last month, two women chained themselves to a railing inside the park’s visitor center to protest the policy.

“The Park Service is meant to protect and preserve wildlife in national parks, not indiscriminately slaughter hundreds of [bison],” one of the protesters, 20-year-old Miriam Wasser, wrote in a leaflet she distributed.

Yellowstone is the only place in the lower 48 states where a bison population has persisted since prehistoric times, according to the Park Service.

Herds once numbered in the tens of millions across the continent but were hunted nearly to extinction by the late 1800s. Protected since the early 20th century, the species has recovered.

Bison graze high on Yellowstone’s grassy plateaus during the summer. When the weather becomes too harsh and food becomes scarce, they often roam outside the park. That’s the problem.

Nash explained the situation in its simplest terms:

“Bison are bison. Bison are nomadic animals. Bison are looking for food. Food is difficult and scarce to come by at the end of the winter. They’re leaving the interior of the park [and going] to lower places, in part, to look for food. There’s limited tolerance for bison outside the boundaries of Yellowstone National Park.”

That’s because just two cases of brucellosis would trigger stringent limits on export of cattle from Montana.

“Montana has spent millions of dollars over the years to get brucellosis eradicated from our livestock,” said Martin Davis, who has a cattle ranch within roaming distance north of the park. “And to put that in jeopardy — no one wants that to happen.”

Control of the bison population is essential, Davis said.

“Bottom line is, there’s too many of them. They’ve got to be managed. They ran out of pasture. … They’re eating themselves out of house and home.”

Under the management plan, rangers and cowboys hired by various government agencies try to harass stray animals back onto park property. Officials shoot animals that can’t be persuaded. (Ranchers are not permitted to kill wild bison).

Meanwhile, hundreds of bison are rounded up inside the park every winter and slaughtered to reduce competition for food and therefore the need for animals to wander onto private land.

“It becomes a private property issue,” said Davis, who has never had a bison encroach on his ranch. “They walked down onto private property. And if you don’t want a buffalo on your private property, you shouldn’t have to have them there.”

Mease, the activist, portrays the conflict as a simple turf war.

“The Montana cattle ranchers don’t want the competition for grass,” he said. “They want the national forests and public lands to be all their public-lands grazing allotments, and in that process, they don’t want bison.”

Federal and state officials said last week they will lease private land bordering the park where up to 100 bison eventually will be allowed to graze during the winter. But the problem is not likely to go away.

“The reality of the situation is that whether you have 4,000 bison or whether you have 200 bison, bison are a nomadic species and they will always be looking out to the horizon and expanding their boundaries,” said Tim Reid, chief deputy ranger at Yellowstone.

So the culling program is expected to return next winter.

“It is our job to protect the viability of this population,” the Park Service’s Nash said. “We take that seriously. We are not taking any actions that will have a serious ongoing negative impact on this population.

“The Yellowstone bison population is healthy, it’s strong, it’s vibrant. We continue to take actions to protect that herd.”
advertisement

But to activists like Mease, it’s just not right to kill healthy bison.

“There’s less than 5,000 wild, genetically pure buffalo left in America,” he said, “and this is how we treat them?” E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend

CNN’s Dan Simon, Chuck Afflerbach and Saeed Ahmed contributed to this report.

Off endangered list, wolves face new pressure from huntersComments

Posted by LGK in news (Monday April 28, 2008 at 0658)

Off endangered list, wolves face new pressure from hunters

By MATTHEW BROWN, Associated Press WriterSun Apr 27, 3:21 PM ET

Tony Saunders stalked his prey for 35 miles by snowmobile through western Wyoming’s Hoback Basin, finally reaching a clearing where he took out a .270-caliber rifle and shot the wolf twice from 30 yards away.

Gray wolves in the Northern Rockies have been taken off the endangered species list and are being hunted freely for the first time since they were placed on that list three decades ago, and nowhere is that hunting easier than Wyoming.

Most of the state with the exception of the Yellowstone National Park area has been designated a “predator zone,” where wolves can be shot at will.

For Saunders, killing that wolf was a long-awaited chance to even things out because he has lost two horses to wolves and blames the canines for depleting local big game herds.

“It’s hard for people to understand how devastating they can be,” said Saunders, 39, who ranches at Bondurant, Wyo., 30 miles southeast of Jackson, Wyo.

Since federal protection was lifted March 28 and states took over wolf management, 37 wolves have been killed, just over 2 percent of their population. Since 66 animals were transplanted to the region 13 years ago, an estimated 1,500 now roam Wyoming, Montana and Idaho.

Environmental and animal rights groups plan to file a lawsuit Monday seeking an emergency injunction to block the killings and trying to put wolves back on the endangered list.

They predict that if states continue to control the animals’ fate and proceed with public hunts, wolves could be driven back nearly to extermination in the region.

“There will be opportunistic shooting 365 days a year. This will become a continual black hole for wolves,” said Franz Camenzind with the Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, which is joining the lawsuit.

Despite the removal of wolves from the endangered list, killing them in the Northern Rockies is nothing new. Last year, a record 186 were shot, primarily by wildlife agents, for killing and harassing livestock.

But since the beginning of this year, 59 wolves already have been reported killed in the three Northern Rockies states, about three times the 19 killed over the same period last year — most of them just in the month since they lost federal protection.

State officials blamed this year’s increased hunting in part on heavy snow, which kept wolf packs at lower elevations where sheep and cattle range.

“That’s the reality of managing wolves in a modern landscape. Some of them are going to be removed,” said Eric Keszler, spokesman for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department.

In fact, entire packs have been legally killed off in past years because of livestock conflicts, according to biologist Mike Jimenez with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

With public hunts planned this year, federal biologists project the three states will maintain a population of 883 to 1,240 wolves at least for the next few years — well above the government’s goal of maintaining a population of at least 300 wolves.

But wolf advocates say the states could systematically cull the population right down to that minimum unless a court intervenes.

Idaho and Wyoming in particular have a “hostile legal regime” that is stacked against wolves, said Doug Honnold, the Earthjustice attorney preparing the lawsuit.

“If anybody can kill wolves, you have no way of ensuring wolf killing isn’t excessive,” he said.

Honnold and other advocates say a minimum of 2,000 to 3,000 wolves is needed to protect their genetic diversity. They contend the government was on track to meet that goal when it caved in to political pressure and stripped the species of endangered status.

Some state officials and ranchers, including Saunders, acknowledge a lingering hostility for wolves, which had been exterminated in the region in the 1930s.

“There’s times I’d like to get rid of all of them, but that’s not realistic either,” Saunders said. “And I’d like for my son one day to be able to hunt them, too.”

Food Lion Shop & ShareComments

Posted by LGK in you can help (Tuesday April 15, 2008 at 2328)

If you have a Food Lion (grocery store) MVP card and would like to help the Red Wolf Coalition — you can register your MVP card for Shop & Share. It is a free and easy way to get much needed funds to RWC.

Go to Food Lion, click on Fundraising, then register your card with Red Wolf Coalition. You can either type in “Red Wolf Coalition” in the space provided or if you feel more comfortable just search for them. They are listed under North Carolina/Columbia/Red Wolf Coalition.

If they get enough people signed up they could get up to $1400.00 a year. Seems like a no brainer - if you shop at Food Lion and buy groceries … you can help. = )

What are you waiting for?

**there are other organizations listed so even if you don’t want to help the wolves … help someone.

Northern Rocky Mountain Wolves Removed From ESLComments

Posted by LGK in news (Friday April 4, 2008 at 2354)

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service News Release, 03/28/2008

Northern Rocky Mountain Wolves Removed From Endangered Species List As Of March 28, 2008

Contacts
Ed Bangs (406) 449-5225, x 204
Joan Jewett (503) 231-6211
Sharon Rose (303) 236-4580

Today, Friday, March 28, 2008, the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf is officially removed from the federal list of endangered species. The States of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming will assume full management authority for the continued conservation of the gray wolf. This wolf population has exceeded its recovery goals for the past several years and is now thriving. Presently, there are more than 1,500 wolves and at least 100 breeding pairs in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming. The Service and States will cooperatively monitor the wolf population for the next five years.

As part of the Service’s delisting action, it designated the northern Rocky Mountain wolf Distinct Population Segment (DPS) as that area that includes all of Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming, the eastern third of Washington and Oregon, and a small corner of north-central Utah.

This action will not affect the status of any wolves outside of the northern Rocky Mountain wolf DPS. Wolves outside the boundaries of the Rocky Mountain DPS and Western Great Lakes DPS (where it was delisted in 2007) will remain listed as endangered. A dispersing wolf would attain the status of the area it is in. For example, if a wolf dispersed to Colorado, it would be considered endangered, whereas a wolf that moves into either DPS would be a delisted wolf and under the management of the States.

Once a species is delisted a State or Tribe has sole management responsibility. The Act includes many safeguards to ensure that the wolf population will remain recovered for the foreseeable future. For example, the Act mandates the Service to monitor the wolf population for at least 5 years after delisting. This helps to ensure the population remains above recovery levels and emerging threats do not jeopardize the wolf population. Annual reports and the Service’s analysis of these reports will be posted on the Service website during that period. Should the wolf population again become threatened or endangered, it could be protected under the ESA again.

Gray wolves were previously listed as endangered in the lower 48 states, except in Minnesota, where they were listed as threatened. The wolf population in the Midwest was delisted in early 2007. With removal of the northern Rocky Mountain population of gray wolves delisted, the Service now oversees the only remaining gray wolf recovery program, the southwestern U.S. wolf population.

Wolves in national parks will remain under the management authority of the National Park Service. On national wildlife refuges, the individual refuge should be contacted, unless a prior arrangement has been made with the state fish and wildlife agency to allow wolf hunting on that refuge. On tribal lands the Tribes have management authority, and they should be contacted. On other lands, where wildlife is typically managed by the respective State fish and wildlife agency, (including federal lands such as those administered by the U.S. Forest Service or BLM) the states should be contacted.

For more information on northern Rocky Mountain gray wolves, visit
www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/wolf/

The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. We are both a leader and trusted partner in fish and wildlife conservation, known for our scientific excellence, stewardship of lands and natural resources, dedicated professionals and commitment to public service. For more information on our work and the people who make it happen, visit www.fws.gov.

LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE

MySpaceComments

Posted by LGK in updates (Tuesday March 11, 2008 at 0430)

Find us on MySpace under Groups at http://groups.myspace.com/wolfsource

Next Page »